# Update the example data used for local development

Example data written for an older database structure, updated so a new setup produces a working application.

Category: Release, deploy, and environments
Source: https://letsship.ai/use-cases/replace-stale-seed-data
Published: 2026-08-25

## Goal

Update development seed data to match the current schema and produce a usable application state.

## Acceptance criteria

- The seed runs clean against the latest migration
- It produces enough data to exercise the main flows
- It contains no real personal data
- Running it twice does not fail or duplicate

## What lands as proof

A clean run against a freshly migrated database, ending in an application somebody can actually use.

## Prompt

Copy this to an agent to open the ticket:

```text
Create a Linear issue in my team and assign it to the SHIP agent.

Title: Refresh the development seed data

Description: Update development seed data to match the current schema and produce a usable application state.

Acceptance criteria:
- The seed runs clean against the latest migration
- It produces enough data to exercise the main flows
- It contains no real personal data
- Running it twice does not fail or duplicate

Before you create the issue, run this repository's seed against a fresh database and record what fails.
```

## Questions

### What does the agent actually change?

The ticket is scoped to one outcome: update development seed data to match the current schema and produce a usable application state. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.

### How do I know the work is done?

The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means the seed runs clean against the latest migration, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.

### How much oversight does this need?

None is required before the run starts. Every claim this ticket makes can be checked by machine, so the agent works straight through and a person reviews the finished pull request like any other.
