Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Add a visual regression baseline for one screen

Accessibility and browser verification|The work pauses once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, and the run continues from there.

A committed baseline so an unintended visual change fails a check instead of shipping.

The ticket

Capture a visual regression baseline for one screen and wire the comparison into the pipeline.

Acceptance criteria

  • A baseline is committed for each state of the screen
  • A deliberately seeded visual change fails the check
  • The comparison tolerates font rendering differences without hiding real changes
  • Updating a baseline is a reviewable, deliberate step

What lands as proof

A seeded change failing the check, which is the only proof the baseline is actually comparing anything.

Why teams defer it

  • A baseline that is too strict fails on font rendering and gets disabled within a week, so the first attempt often poisons the idea.
  • Somebody has to own updating baselines, and that ownership is never assigned.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: capture a visual regression baseline for one screen and wire the comparison into the pipeline. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means baseline committed, a seeded change fails the check, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, which is the cheapest moment to redirect the work.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.