Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Bump the language runtime and clear the deprecated-API fallout

Dependency and runtime upgrades|The work pauses once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, and the run continues from there.

A runtime version bump, with the deprecated calls it surfaces fixed rather than silenced.

The ticket

Move the project to a newer language runtime and fix the deprecated APIs the new version reports.

Acceptance criteria

  • CI runs green on the new runtime
  • Deprecated calls the new runtime reports are replaced
  • The version is pinned consistently across the manifest, CI, and the container image
  • Nothing is silenced with a suppression flag

What lands as proof

A green matrix on the new runtime and a diff showing each deprecated call replaced rather than muted.

Why teams defer it

  • The runtime is pinned in four places and somebody always finds a fifth after the merge.
  • It is invisible to users, so it competes badly against anything with a customer waiting.
  • Support windows close quietly. The upgrade only becomes urgent when a security patch stops being backported.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: move the project to a newer language runtime and fix the deprecated APIs the new version reports. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means cI green across the new runtime matrix, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, which is the cheapest moment to redirect the work.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.