Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Add the accessibility audit to the pipeline

Audits and budgets|The work pauses for the plan, and the review bar is raised so that smaller suggestions also block the merge, not only serious findings.

The accessibility audit moved from a report somebody runs to a gate new violations cannot pass.

The ticket

Add the accessibility audit to the pipeline so new violations cannot merge.

Acceptance criteria

  • The audit runs on every pull request
  • A seeded violation fails the build
  • Existing violations are recorded as a baseline that can only shrink
  • The baseline is visible rather than hidden in configuration

What lands as proof

A seeded violation failing the build, plus a baseline that ratchets down rather than absorbing new failures.

Why teams defer it

  • Turning it on with existing violations blocks every pull request, so a baseline is required first.
  • A baseline that can grow is not a gate, and configuring it to only shrink takes deliberate setup.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: add the accessibility audit to the pipeline so new violations cannot merge. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means a seeded violation fails the build, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops for the plan, and the review bar is raised afterwards so that smaller suggestions block the merge too, not only serious findings.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.