Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Make the build reproducible

Build, containers, and artifacts|The work pauses once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, and the run continues from there.

A build that produces different output from the same commit, pinned until it does not.

The ticket

Make the build produce identical output from the same commit.

Acceptance criteria

  • Two builds of the same commit produce identical artefacts
  • Toolchain versions are pinned rather than floating
  • Timestamps and other nondeterministic inputs are normalised
  • The comparison is automated

What lands as proof

A byte comparison of two independent builds of the same commit.

Why teams defer it

  • Nondeterminism is invisible until you try to prove two artefacts are the same.
  • The causes are scattered across timestamps, ordering, and toolchain versions, so it is a hunt rather than a fix.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: make the build produce identical output from the same commit. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means two builds of one commit produce identical output, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, which is the cheapest moment to redirect the work.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.