Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Remove exports that nothing in the workspace imports

Dead code and stale content|Everything this ticket has to prove is checked by machine, so it can be handed over as it is. A person still reads the pull request and decides whether to merge it.

A public surface larger than anything that uses it, trimmed to what is actually imported.

The ticket

Remove exports that nothing in the workspace imports.

Acceptance criteria

  • Every removed export is confirmed unimported across the workspace
  • The build passes
  • Exports intended as public API are excluded and listed
  • The count removed is stated

What lands as proof

A workspace-wide import check plus a green build, with intentional public API explicitly excluded.

Why teams defer it

  • An export might be somebody's public API, and telling the difference needs a decision rather than a tool.
  • Unused exports keep dead code alive by making it look reachable.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: remove exports that nothing in the workspace imports. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means build green, the public surface shrinks by a listed count, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
None is required before the run starts. Every claim this ticket makes can be checked by machine, so the agent works straight through and a person reviews the finished pull request like any other.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.